A Comparative Look at the List of ICH in Need of Urgent Safeguarding of UNESCO Examples of Mongolia, Uganda, China and Türkiye

Authors

  • Pınar Kasapoğlu Ankara Üniversitesi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61620/tfa.45

Keywords:

List of ICH in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, Mongolia, Uganda, China, Türkiye, local governments

Abstract

The "Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage",(ICH) adopted by UNESCO in 2003, has been one of the cultural conventions that has attracted the most international attention since the day it was signed by 183 State Parties, as of December 2024. "ICH Lists" created within the context of the Convention have become the visible face of the State Parties' efforts to safeguard cultural heritage elements in the international arena. The most popular list is the "Representative List of the ICH of Humanity (RL)". "List of ICH in Need of Urgent Safeguarding (NUS)" is the importance and necessity of which are frequently emphasized, and "Register of Good Safeguarding Practices (GSP)" are the ICH Lists. The list that best suits the logic of the Convention to safeguard and preserve a cultural heritage element as quickly as possible is the Urgent Safeguarding List. It is known that the Intergovernmental Committee, which is the decision-making body of the Convention, has given priority to the Urgent Safeguarding List and the Register of Good Practices, taking into account the number of elements registered in the lists of the State Parties, due to the density in the Representative List in recent years. In the evaluations made by the Committee in order for any element to be registered on the Urgent Safeguarding List, attention is paid to the viability of the element, the applicability of the protection plan and their adequacy. Additionally, whether there are tools to preserve this heritage; The contributions of traditional knowledge carriers, local governments, municipalities and NGO’s are taken into account. Also, it is seen that criteria such as the extent to which the transfer can be achieved or the extent of the risk of loss due to globalization and social-environmental transformation processes are also prioritized in the evaluation process. There are three heritage elements registered from Türkiye, in the Urgent Safeguarding List as of December 2024, namely Whistling Language, Traditional Ahlat Stone Workmanship and Traditional knowledge, methods and practices concerning olive cultivation. The three countries with the highest number of elements registered on the Urgent Safeguarding List are Mongolia, Uganda and China. Considering the Intergovernmental Committee's approaches to safeguarding and its decisions on evaluation criteria in implementation processes, it can be predicted that the elements on the Urgent Safeguarding List will increase in number as well as their importance and value. In this article, in addition to the three elements in Turkey's Urgent Safeguarding List, an example from the first three countries with the highest number of elements registered on the list is selected, also the importance and contributions of local governments in the safeguarding processes of these elements have been tried to be conveyed.

References

Empaako tradition of the Batooro, Banyoro, Batuku, Batagwenda and Banyabindi of western Uganda Nomination Form (2013), Nomination File No: 00904, List of Intangiable Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, https://ich.unesco.org/en/USL/empaako-tradition-of-the-batooro-banyoro-batuku-batagwenda-and-banyabindi-of-western-uganda-00904, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Empaako tradition of the Batooro, Banyoro, Batuku, Batagwenda and Banyabindi of western Uganda, Consent Communities (2013). File No: 16995, https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/16995-EN.pdf, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Gürçayır, S. (2011). “Somut Olmayan Kültürel Mirasın Korunması Sözleşmesi Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Okuma”, Millî Folklor, Yıl 23, Sayı 92, s. 5-12.

Gürçayır Teke, S. (2013). "Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları ve Somut Olmayan Kültürel Miras: Katılım, Akreditasyon ve Eksiklikler", Somut Olmayan Kültürel Mirasın Geleceği Türkiye Deneyimi, (Ed. M. Öcal Oğuz vd.), s.43-47, Ankara: UNESCO Türkiye Millî Komisyonu Yayını.

Karakul, Ö., Yıldız, T. (2020). The Role of Local Governments in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage-Türkiye [Kültürel Mirasın Korunmasında Yerel Yönetimlerin Rolü-Türkiye], UCLG-MEWA, İstanbul). https://uclg-mewa.org/uploads/file/6d44af25b1604d4894507cf8658500ef/Kulturel_Mirasin_Korunmasinda_Yerel_Yonetimlerin_Rolu-Turkiye.pdf, Erişim tarihi 24.10.2024.

Karakul, Ö. (2023). “Kültürel Mirasın Bütüncül Korunmasında Yerel Yönetimlerin Rolü: Somut ve Somut Olmayan Miras Koruma Deneyimleri”, Kültür Mirası Yönetı̇mı̇: Neden ve Nasıl? Türkiye'den Deneyimler ve Tartışmalar, s. 717- 735, İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.

Metin Basat, E. (2013). “Somut Olmayan Kültürel Miras ve Yerel Yönetim Uygulamaları”, Somut Olmayan Kültürel Mirasın Geleceği Türkiye Deneyimi, (Ed. M. Öcal Oğuz vd.), Ankara: UNESCO Türkiye Millî Komisyonu Yayını.

Mongol Biyelgee, Mongolian traditional folk dance Nomination Form (2009), Nomination File No: 00311, List of Intangiable Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, https://ich.unesco.org/en/USL/mongol-biyelgee-mongolian-traditional-folk-dance-00311, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Mongol Biyelgee, Mongolian traditional folk dance Consent Communities (2009). File No: 01221, https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/01221.pdf, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Oğuz, Ö. (2017). “Onuncu Yılında Somut Olmayan Kültürel Miras Listeleri: Görünürlük, Değerlilik ve Güvenirlik”, Millî Folklor, Yıl 29, Sayı 116, s. 5-17.

Somut Olmayan Kültürel Mirasın Korunması Sözleşmesi, (2005). Millî Folklor, (Fr. Çev.: M. Öcal Oğuz, İng. Çev.: Yeliz Özay, Göz. Geç.: Pulat Tacar), Yıl: 17, Sayı: 65, s.: 163-171.

Traditional Ahlat Stonework Nomination Form (2022), Nomination File No: 00655, List of Intangiable Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, https://ich.unesco.org/en/USL/traditional-ahlat-stonework-00655, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Traditional Ahlat Stonework Inventery (2022), File No: 51984, https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/33899.pdf, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Traditional Ahlat Stonework Consent Communities (2022). File No: 51985, https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/34811.pdf, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

UNESCO Intergovermental Committee For The Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Decisions Report (2007), ITH/07/1.EXT.COM/CONF.207/Decisions, Chengdu, 26 May 2007, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000234392, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

UNESCO Listelerinde Türkiye: https://ich.unesco.org/en/lists?text=&country[]=00228&multinational=3#tabs, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Uygulama Yönergesi (Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage) (2022). https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/2003_Convention_Basic_Texts-_2022_version-EN_.pdf, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Whistled Language Nomination Form (2017), Nomination File No: 00658 for Inscription in 2017 on the List of Intangiable Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, https://ich.unesco.org/en/USL/whistled-language-00658, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Whistled Language Inventery (2016), File No: 33899, https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/33899.pdf, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Whistled Language Consent Communities (2016). File No: 34811, https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/34811.pdf, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Wooden movable-type printing of China (2010), Nomination File No: 00322, List of Intangiable Cultural Heritage in Need of Urgent Safeguarding, https://ich.unesco.org/en/USL/wooden-movable-type-printing-of-china-00322, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Wooden movable-type printing of China (2022), Report on the Status of an Element Inscribed on the List of Intangible Cultural Heritage In Need of Urgent Safeguarding, https://ich.unesco.org/en/state/china-CN?info=periodic-reporting#usl-0326-2019, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Yıldız, T. (2020). Somut Olmayan Kültürel Miras Yönetimi: Sivil Toplum Katılımı, Ankara: Geleneksel Yayıncılık.

Traditional knowledge, methods and practices concerning olive cultivation (2023), https://ich.unesco.org/en/USL/traditional-knowledge-methods-and-practices-concerning-olive-cultivation-01983, Erişim tarihi 08.12.2024.

Published

2025-01-08 — Updated on 2025-01-08

How to Cite

Kasapoğlu, P. (2025). A Comparative Look at the List of ICH in Need of Urgent Safeguarding of UNESCO Examples of Mongolia, Uganda, China and Türkiye. Türk Folklor Araştırmaları, (370), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.61620/tfa.45

Issue

Section

Articles