Andrea Arnold’s Movie Cow and Its Autoetnographic Evocations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61620/tfa.57Keywords:
cow, autoethnography, multispecies ethnography, animal rights, women's studiesAbstract
In this study, I try to understand the film Cow (2021) by British director Andrea Arnold from the director's perspective and evaluate it from an ecologist's perspective. In Arnold's films, which bear traces of her own life, there is an effort to make visible the efforts of women, non-human females and the invisible. For this reason, animals also become characters in her films, and Luma, the main character of Cow, was specially chosen for this. The Cow movie has strong messages in terms of animal rights and women's studies. The film also has innovative and exemplary features for ethnography. In the film, which has a documentary quality, the camera becomes the eye of the cow, and while this allows the cow to show itself, it also invites the audience to understand the world through the eyes of the cow. Instead of talking about it, as new ethnography tries to do today, the film shows that a collaborative production process is possible by standing side by side with it.In my article, I mainly try to understand the film, but the evocations of it also made me think about the cow-human relations of my own world. Thus, the article developed on two main axes: In the first, I focused on who the director was, the Cow movie, and what the main character Luma in the movie was talking about, while in the second, I looked for answers about how all of these things related to me. In the first part, I try to understand the movie through the expansion of multispecies ethnography or posthumanist (auto)ethnography. In the second part, I tried to examine the movie's relevance to me with an autoethnographic approach through the movie's evocative images, while also deepening my thoughts on the relationship between humans and cows.Ultimately, the movie allows us to see and appreciate Luma's efforts in all their reality. Just as it made me think about my own human-animal relationships, I must say that the movie gave me the opportunity to reconsider these relationships for a better world.
References
Abrell, E. & Gruen, L. (2020). Ethics and animal ethnography working paper.
Wesleyan Animal
Studies.https://www.wesleyan.edu/animalstudies/WASEvents/FinalEthicsandAnima
lEthnographyDraft.
Adams T. E, Holman Jones S., Ellis, C. (2015). Autoethnography. New York: Oxford University.
Akın, S. (1996). Makiler. İstanbul: Cem.
Altuntek, N. S. (2009) ‘Yerli’nin bakışı, etnografya: Kuram ve yöntem. Ankara: Ütopya.
Aygün Cengiz, S. (Hzl.) vd. (2021) Onun kitabını anlatıyorum, Renato Rosaldo The day of Shelly’s death: The poetry and ethnography of grief (Shelly’nin öldüğü gün: Yasın şiiri ve etnografisi), Ankara: Ürün.
Balkır, N. (2019). Rembrandt’tan Damien Hirst’e sanatta hayvan karkasının temsili. İdil Sanat ve Dil Dergisi 8 (63), 1415-1420.
Burgan, E. (2017). Çoklu türler etnografisi: Yüz yüze bir araştırma imkanı üzerine düşünceler. Moment Dergi, 4(1): 115-134.
Butler, J. (2005). Kırılgan hayat. Yasın ve şiddetin gücü. (B. Ertür, Çev.) İstanbul: Metis.
Burul, Y. (2022) Şefkat ve zulüm hakkında her şey. Altyazı Sinema Dergisi. https://altyazi.net/soylesiler/andrea-arnold-ile-inek-uzerine-soylesi/
Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnograpy. AltaMira.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E. & Bochner, A. P. (2010). Autoethnography: An overview [40 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1101108.
Freeman C. P., Tulloch, S. (2013). Was blind but now I see: Animal liberation documentaries’ deconstruction of barriers to witnessing injustice. In A. Pick & G. Narraway (Eds) Screening Nature: Cinema beyond the human Ch. 6. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Gremels, A. (t.y.). Opacity (Édouard Glissant). Keywords in transcultural English studies.
http://www.transcultural-english-studies.de/opacite-opacity-edouard-glissant/.
Gülbay, F. (2021). Flanözün sanatı: Fotoğraflarla otoetnografik bir yürüyüş. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İletişim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
Hattenstone, S. (2022). I kept saying – don’t worry Luma, we see you: Andrea Arnold on her four years filming a cow. The Guardian, 6 Ocak 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/06/i-kept-saying-dont-worry-luma-we-see-you-andrea-arnold-on-her-four-years-filming-a-cow.
Ingram, D. (2013) The aesthetics and ethics of eco-film criticism. Ecocinema theory and practice. (Stephen Rust, Salma Monani, and Sean Cubitt, Eds.)
Jardins, J. R. Des (2006). Çevre etiği, çevre felsefesine giriş. (R. Keleş, Çev.) Ankara: İmge.
Karabaşa, S. (2019) Geçmişteki gelecek: Sürdürülebilirlik arayışında köylülüğün yeniden keşfi. Ankara, Ürün E-Kültür Dizisi: 6.
McHugh, S. (2005). Toplumun aynasında köpek. (S. Çağlayan, Çev.) İstanbul: Kitapyayınevi.
Mills, B. (2015). Towards a theory of documentary representation for animals Get access Arrow, Screen, 56 (1), Spring 2015, 102–107.
Noyes, D. (2016) Humble theory: Folklore’s grasp on social life. Indiana: Indiana University.
Özçürümez Bilgili, G. (2021). İlongotların izinde yas ve melankoli. Onun kitabını anlatıyorum. Renato Rozaldo. (Hzl. S. Aygün Cengiz), e-kültür dizisi: 14, 428-467. Ankara: Ürün Yayınları
Poulos, C. N. (2009) Accidental Ethnography, An inquiry into family Secrecy. California: Left Coast.
Regan, T. (2007). Kafesler boşalsın, hayvan haklarıyla yüzleşmek. (S. Çağlayan, Çev.) İstanbul: İletişim.
Robinson, L. C. (2011) Posthumanist (auto)ethnography: Toward the ethical representation of other animals. Master Thesis, Colorado State Universty.
Siddiq, A. B. ve Habib, A. (2017). Antropoloji’de ortaya çıkan çok-disiplinli güçlü bir alt bilim: Antrozooloji. Artuklu Human and Social Science Journal. 2 (1): 22-35.
Smaill, B. (2016). Regarding Life: Animals and the documentary moving image. Suny.
Szarkowski, J. (1978). Mirrors and windows: American photography since 1960. The Museum of Modern Art: Distributed by New York Graphic Society.
Taylor, C. (2008). The precarious lives of animals: Butler, Coetzee, and animal ethics. Philosophy Today.45 (1): 60-72.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Solmaz Karabaşa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.